Revisiting Counter-model Generation for Minimal Implicational Logic

The LMT^→ sequent calculus was introduced in Santos (2016). This paper presents a Termination proof and a new (more direct) Completeness proof for it. LMT^→ is aimed to be used for proof search in Propositional Minimal Implicational Logic (M^→), in a bottom-up approach. Termination of the calculus is guaranteed by a rule application strategy that stresses all the possible combinations. For an initial formula α, proofs in LMT^→ have an upper bound of |α| × 2^|α| + 1 + 2 × log_2|α|, which together with the system strategy ensure decidability. LMT^→ has the property to allow extractability of counter-models from failed proof searches (bicompleteness), i.e., the attempt proof tree of an expanded branch produces a Kripke model that falsifies the initial formula.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset
Success!
Error Icon An error occurred

Sign in with Google

×

Use your Google Account to sign in to DeepAI

×

Consider DeepAI Pro